<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and hidden links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Geeks - This is Where We Write</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spyda</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-11056</link>
		<dc:creator>Spyda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-11056</guid>
		<description>A great answer thank you Rich!

I was looking all over from something from Google to say just that. It seemed strange that they would penalise a usual web design standard.

Thankfully, I&#039;m not out to cheat the system. As far as I&#039;m aware all hidden text has the same text as the image that replaces it. I figure make those bits (as well as everything else) keyword rich (without going overboard).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great answer thank you Rich!</p>
<p>I was looking all over from something from Google to say just that. It seemed strange that they would penalise a usual web design standard.</p>
<p>Thankfully, I&#8217;m not out to cheat the system. As far as I&#8217;m aware all hidden text has the same text as the image that replaces it. I figure make those bits (as well as everything else) keyword rich (without going overboard).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hamlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-11055</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-11055</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree with Rich, same as what I&#039;ve said but a better explanation :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree with Rich, same as what I&#8217;ve said but a better explanation <img src='http://www.wuup.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Quick</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-11050</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-11050</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t affect your ranking, except where they ban you altogether.

This only happens after a human review, and they email you to explain why.

It&#039;s happened on 2 sites I know of, both times it was for having content in the link / h1 which different to the text in in.

Eg. Saying &quot;Keyword&quot; in an h1 but image replacing it with &quot;welcome to our store&quot;.

Image replacement is allowed, but it has to be the same content .. not a trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t affect your ranking, except where they ban you altogether.</p>
<p>This only happens after a human review, and they email you to explain why.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s happened on 2 sites I know of, both times it was for having content in the link / h1 which different to the text in in.</p>
<p>Eg. Saying &#8220;Keyword&#8221; in an h1 but image replacing it with &#8220;welcome to our store&#8221;.</p>
<p>Image replacement is allowed, but it has to be the same content .. not a trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hamlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-10974</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-10974</guid>
		<description>Ignorance doesn&#039;t count in googles rule book :P but they simply cannot detect it YET, so you are safe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignorance doesn&#8217;t count in googles rule book <img src='http://www.wuup.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  but they simply cannot detect it YET, so you are safe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-10971</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-10971</guid>
		<description>My understanding is Google will only ban your site if your hiding the content to trick it or to be malicious so in this case I would guess you&#039;d be OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is Google will only ban your site if your hiding the content to trick it or to be malicious so in this case I would guess you&#8217;d be OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hamlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-10968</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-10968</guid>
		<description>:P yeah, its possible, unlikely though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.wuup.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  yeah, its possible, unlikely though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spyda</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-10967</link>
		<dc:creator>Spyda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-10967</guid>
		<description>Yes, how they would work out it was hidden with CSS seeing as bots don&#039;t really read it. So have I just opened myself up for being reported? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, how they would work out it was hidden with CSS seeing as bots don&#8217;t really read it. So have I just opened myself up for being reported? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hamlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/google-and-hidden-links#comment-10966</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=3419#comment-10966</guid>
		<description>You are at risk of having your site banned for hiding links, Google doesn&#039;t find it easy to find these links, infact i doubt they will find your ones, but more likely google encourages other users to report sites doing such a thing via their webmaster tools :P so in short, i recommend that you don&#039;t hide links, but you are unlikely to be caught, and their are no negatives until you are caught</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are at risk of having your site banned for hiding links, Google doesn&#8217;t find it easy to find these links, infact i doubt they will find your ones, but more likely google encourages other users to report sites doing such a thing via their webmaster tools <img src='http://www.wuup.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  so in short, i recommend that you don&#8217;t hide links, but you are unlikely to be caught, and their are no negatives until you are caught</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

