<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wuup.co.uk/twitter-rant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/twitter-rant</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Geeks - This is Where We Write</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hamlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/twitter-rant#comment-10442</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=2521#comment-10442</guid>
		<description>Hey there, in my opinion, to fix it, it needs more filtering, groups etc, to get down the right people which interest you, people who are interested by you. Perhaps a filter of either adding tags to a profile, or simply choosing a primary and secondary category.

Before any of this, they need robust spam filters, and rid spam 99% - the limit of 2000 on following people to me is not a fix for spam, but a workaround, it will only lower spam levels slightly.

Need some idea in my opinion to spot so many links being posted, or at least flag activity of those who post a link on every single tweet (spamming).

They are a few points that I feel would improve twitter, trouble is with the groups etc, or tags - a) it opens up new ways to spam - B) kinda defeats the object of twitter really, it&#039;d become more like facebook.

Thanks for your comment :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, in my opinion, to fix it, it needs more filtering, groups etc, to get down the right people which interest you, people who are interested by you. Perhaps a filter of either adding tags to a profile, or simply choosing a primary and secondary category.</p>
<p>Before any of this, they need robust spam filters, and rid spam 99% &#8211; the limit of 2000 on following people to me is not a fix for spam, but a workaround, it will only lower spam levels slightly.</p>
<p>Need some idea in my opinion to spot so many links being posted, or at least flag activity of those who post a link on every single tweet (spamming).</p>
<p>They are a few points that I feel would improve twitter, trouble is with the groups etc, or tags &#8211; a) it opens up new ways to spam &#8211; B) kinda defeats the object of twitter really, it&#8217;d become more like facebook.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment <img src='http://www.wuup.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Directory 2000</title>
		<link>http://www.wuup.co.uk/twitter-rant#comment-10414</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Directory 2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wuup.co.uk/?p=2521#comment-10414</guid>
		<description>Quite a rant, Twitter is too cluttered and does not have enough value in my eyes. That is value in reading tweets. It is all a bunch of spam. How can we change that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a rant, Twitter is too cluttered and does not have enough value in my eyes. That is value in reading tweets. It is all a bunch of spam. How can we change that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

